Domain continuity
Redirects, mirror domains, and look-alike spellings are recorded. A matching brand name on a different domain is not assumed to be the same authorised service.
A badge, footer line, or copied licence number is not enough. This protocol starts with the claim on the operator page, then checks the regulator’s own current register and records exactly what does—and does not—match.
We copy the exact operator name, licence number, regulator, and domain from the casino’s public page, then search the regulator’s own register. We require an active status and a domain or trading-name match, record the date, and state the jurisdictional limit. If any element conflicts or is absent, the claim remains unverified.
| Evidence state | What we found | Editorial treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Matched | Official register, active status, and relevant operator or domain align. | Describe only the matched authorisation and its jurisdiction. |
| Partial | The operator exists, but the domain, product, or trading name is not confirmed. | Do not award a positive trust signal; show the missing field. |
| Conflict | Status is inactive, domain differs, or the claimed number belongs to another entity. | Flag the conflict and remove the claim from scoring. |
| No primary source | Only the casino page, review sites, or social posts repeat the statement. | Label unverified and request a regulator or registry source. |
An official register can confirm that a regulator has authorised a business for a defined activity. It cannot, by itself, answer whether that service may be offered to or used by someone in Egypt. Our review therefore reports the register result, its scope, and the unresolved local boundary separately.
Redirects, mirror domains, and look-alike spellings are recorded. A matching brand name on a different domain is not assumed to be the same authorised service.
Visible browser or Google security warnings block a positive trust statement until the affected URL and current primary-source status are understood.
Where an official regulator publishes actions, we distinguish current status from historical sanctions instead of reducing both to a yes/no badge.
Register entries can change. Every claim carries an observation date and must be checked again when the domain, operator, or licence wording changes.
No. A logo is a claim made by the page. Verification requires the regulator’s own register, an active status, and a matching operator or domain. The licence must also cover the service and jurisdiction being discussed.
Not by itself. A foreign register describes that regulator’s authorisation; it does not replace local law or establish that the service may be offered to a person in Egypt. We keep licence evidence and local-availability claims separate.
We label it unverified, exclude it from positive scoring, save the URL and observation date, and request a primary source. We do not convert an operator statement or a review-site repetition into a verified fact.
Open the public product only to reproduce its visible wording. Do not treat the product page itself as independent licence evidence.
Open the official public interface